1. 20-5(3)(d) Company has ceased to meet registration requirement that it has a sufficient number of registered tax practitioner individuals to provide tax agent services to a competent standard and to provide supervisory arrangements

KPG Taxation Craigieburn Pty Ltd

Ceased to meet the registration requirement
• 20-5(3)(d)(i) The company must have sufficient number of individuals, being registered tax practitioners, to provide services to a competent standard and to carry out supervisory arrangements

On 4 December 2025, after completing an investigation, the Tax Practitioners Board (TPB) decided to terminate the tax agent registration of KPG Taxation Craigieburn Pty Ltd (the Company) on the basis that the Company ceased to meet the tax practitioner registration requirement under subparagraph 20-5(3)(d)(i) of the TASA that it must have a sufficient number of individuals, being registered tax practitioners, to provide services to a competent standard and to carry out supervisory arrangements..
The Board determined that the Company’s sole supervising agent, Mr Parampreet Singh Rajput (Mr Rajput) was not considered sufficient to provide tax agent services to a competent standard and to carry out supervisory arrangements.

The TPB considered its role as regulator of the tax practitioner profession and focused on protecting the public and the integrity of the tax practitioner profession, consistent with the object of the TASA. Accordingly, the TPB decided to terminate the Company’s registration as a tax agent as it had ceased to meet the registration requirement in subparagraph 20-5(3)(d)(i) of the TASA that it must have a sufficient number of registered individual tax agents to provide tax agent services to a competent standard and to carry out supervisory arrangements.

On 15 January 2026, the Company applied to the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) for a stay and review of the TPB’s decision of 4 December 2025 to terminate its tax agent registration.
On 26 March 2026, the ART refused the Company’s application for a stay of the TPB’s decision.
The review of the TPB’s decision is yet to be heard.